The Sitting Exam is separated into sections that test the student’s verbal and mathematical skills. Within the verbal or Critical Studying Section, about 20 questions test the student’s understanding of vocabulary. Although a lot of approach the Sitting by memorizing and drilling lists of words, memory of lists missing of context, minimizes the possibilities of retention and maximizes the possibilities of confusion.
Furthermore, test does not test vocabulary questions within the vacuum. Rather, it poses sentence completion questions, thus offering a context. So, it seems sensible to understand words in their context – their normal usage.
Furthermore, inside the sentence completion questions, numerous questions originate from pairs of words. These questions generally follow one of many patterns i.e. the missing words that complete the sentence may be contrasting terms or they could be complementary ones. Students that could determine inside the flow within the sentence whether or not this implies a contrast or harmony, is on his method of selecting the correct answer. Fortunately, this skill – inferring the sentiment and intent within the sentence may be trained. Keywords for example “to be able to” imply the missing terms within the sentence come in agreement. Compared, the text, despite although, imply the sentence is creating an opposition or divergence.
Other word pair questions test the student’s understanding of idioms, in both the word what or in the professional jargon. Such questions, there might be several choice that properly fits the needs within the sentence. But, test expects students to understand that a person inside the peak in the career or status reaches its ‘zenith.’ Similarly, although an over-all might ‘urge’ his troops disappear an ‘exposed’ position, only they are able to ‘order’ them to accomplish this. Which gives test the chance to find out if students realizes that the greater sophisticated term: ‘untenable’ may be substituted with ‘exposed.’
